Evaluation Argument paper
- Length: 600-750 words/2-3 pages double-spaced (not including Works Cited) in MLA format, 12-point font, research required
- Source limit: One (1) source minimum
- Evaluation arguments rate their subjects on a scale from positive to negative. They make a claim about the quality of something. We can think them as answering the question “How good or bad is it?”
- You must include a “Works Cited” page and use correct MLA format for in-text (parenthetical) citations.
- Evaluative claims argue that something is GOOD (or BAD) because it meets certain criteria.
- Use aesthetic, moral, and practical criteria for deciding how good or bad a text, a place, an artifact, or a policy is
- Evaluation arguments focus on what we value:
- If your criteria do not appeal to the values of your audience, your readers will not feel that your evaluation is accurate.
- Depending on your audience, you might use all three kinds of criteria, or you might focus more on one or two kinds.
- Aesthetic, moral, practical (3 types of criteria)
- Criteria to consider when evaluating a short story
- Setting:
- Setting is a description of where and when the story takes place. In a short story there are fewer settings compared to a novel. The time is more limited. Ask yourself the following questions:
- How is the setting created? Consider geography, weather, time of day, social conditions, etc.
- What role does setting play in the story? Is it an important part of the plot or theme? Or is it just a backdrop against which the action takes place?
- Characterization: dialogue, relatability, how human are they?
- Well-Structured Plot: The main character should undergo some kind of change.
- Conflict/Tension
- Theme/Lesson/Message
- Style
- Your thesis statement will look something like this:
- – Flannery O’Connor’s “A Good Man is Hard to Find”/ Edwidge Danticat’s “New York Day Women” is a good/bad story because of X, Y, and Z.
- X, Y, and Z are the criteria you will use to evaluate the story. Make sure you are as specific as possible
Evalution