Individual Video Assignment: Applying the SCOR Model to Operations in Developing Countries
Introduction
Imagine that you are an operations manager of either manufacturing, service, or distribution corporation or in the military sector and there is a crisis in the supply chain because of sourcing materials from developing nations. In the competitive environment of your organization, it is increasingly becoming a competition between supply chains rather than a competition of competitors. Your supervisor has learned the hard way that a one size fits all approach is not working and your organization needs to create a plan that takes into consideration the most fitting supply chain management approach and model tailored to the specific organization processes and the environment in which the organization is operating. He/she has asked for your help to create a plan that will be the most efficient and adaptive possible for the organization.
In preparation for this activity, please be sure to have read and viewed the following:
- Digital Guide Ionos. (2020). The SCOR model: definition and tasks explained.
- White, S. (2021). What is SCOR? A model for improving supply chain management.
- Hyatt, P. (2016). The 5 essential stages in developing a successful supply chain.
- com.The Ultimate SCOR Model for Supply Chain Decisions.
- Burch, J. (2020). Introduction to SCOR Model. [Video, 04:19]. YouTube.
- (2013).What’s the SCOR with the Supply Chain Council. [Video, 07:15]. YouTube.
- APICS Archives. (2017).Introduction to SCOR – How to make an impact. [Video, 48:15]. YouTube.
- Mattison, D. (2015). Using the SCOR Framework as a Practical Framework to Benchmark and Improve Supply Chain Structures. [Video, 16:34]. YouTube.
Instructions
For this assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation which you will present via Zoom. In your presentation, you will explain the challenges and barriers to implementing the SCOR Model in developing countries. You will create a plan for adapting the model to these environments that can be applied to local scenarios and conditions. SCOR model encompasses all the activities of suppliers, customers, material flows, and all market interactions.
The SCOR model consists of five basic processes, Plan (P), Source (S), Make (M), Deliver (D), and Return (R). The SCOR modeling approach starts with the assumption that any supply chain process can be represented as a combination of the processes P, S, M, D, and R. You will need to create an operations plan that considers the organization from an economic, environmental and social perspective and measures performance based on net impact on profit, people, and the planet. You will explain how you will create the most efficient supply chain in these types of markets and how your plan can be applied to any market that your organization could wish to penetrate or source materials for your supply chain network. lastly, you will explain how you will develop a process, develop tailored performance metrics, and identify appropriate applications of best practices to the model.
Your PowerPoint should consist of 10-15 slides and your video presentation should be at least eight minutes in length. In addition, your PowerPoint presentation should contain the following:
- Detailed speaker’s notes
- References and citations from at least foursources
- Visually appealing pictures or animations
If you have not yet set up your Zoom account, please see these instructions
Download these instructions
. Note: you will be recording an MP4 file that will save locally to your computer. Please upload that MP4 file to the discussion. Please also include a written transcript in your post. For more information on starting a Zoom meeting and recording, please see these links:
Zoom Video Tutorials Home
Using Zoom with Canvas FAQ
Local (MP4) Recording With Zoom
To embed your video in the discussion, please see these instructions:
Embedding a Video in a Canvas Discussion
Evaluation
Individual assignments are worth 25% of your final grade. This assignment is due Sunday by 11:59 PM ET. You will be assessed using the SCOR Model Presentation Rubric.
References
PPT Basics (Links to an external site.) |
Outcomes | Course Q & A |
Return to Learning Pathway
Rubric
Applying the SCOR Model Presentation Rubric
Applying the SCOR Model Presentation Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
20 pts | |||
40 pts | |||
20 pts | |||
20 pts | |||
Total Points: 100 |
20 pts A You provide a clear and detailed overview of the challenges and barriers of sourcing materials from a developing world. |
16 pts B You provide an overview of the challenges and barriers of sourcing materials from a developing world. |
14 pts C You provide a brief overview of the challenges and barriers of sourcing materials from a developing world. |
10 pts D You attempt to provide a brief overview of the challenges and barriers of sourcing materials from a developing world. |
0 pts 0 Does not address this criterion in the assignment. Did not submit assignment. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy. |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome SCOR Model Plan |
40 pts A You clearly and comprehensively lay out a SCOR Model Plan that has been adapted for a developing country. Your plan includes the following components: an explanation of the development of the organization process in a new region, identification and explanation of the performance metrics that should be used and, suggested best practices for applying the model to the operating environment of the organization. |
32 pts B You lay out a SCOR Model Plan that has been adapted for a developing country. Your plan is missing at least one of the following components: an explanation of the development of the organization process in a new region, identification and explanation of the performance metrics that should be used, and suggested best practices for applying the model to the operating environment of the organization. |
28 pts C You attempt to lay out a SCOR Model Plan that has been adapted for a developing country. Your plan is missing more than one of the following components: an explanation of the development of the organization process in a new region, identification and explanation of the performance metrics that should be used, and suggested best practices for applying the model to the operating environment of the organization. |
24 pts D Your SCOR Model Plan lacks clarity and does not address each of the required components laid out in the assignment. |
0 pts 0 Does not address this criterion in the assignment. Did not submit assignment. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy. |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence-Supported References |
20 pts A You provide at least four evidence-supported references to justify your SCOR Model plan. Examples and cited sources of evidence are integrated to carefully justify the plan. |
16 pts B You provide three evidence-supported references to justify your SCOR Model plan. Sources of evidence are provided to explain the plan. |
14 pts C You provide at least two evidence-supported references to justify your SCOR Model plan. Sources of evidence are provided, but an explanation of the relevance to the plan are not present. |
10 pts D You provide less than two evidence-supported references to justify your SCOR Model plan. |
0 pts 0 Does not address this criterion in the assignment. Did not submit assignment. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy. |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Video Presentation Criteria |
20 pts A Various presentation props and tools are used creatively and effectively to enhance persuasion. Technology visually and auditorily engaged audience with natural and consistent flow from screen to screen throughout the entire delivery of the presentation. Communication style and word choice is appropriate (e.g., professional). Written work progresses logically and ideas are complete. Bulleted points are well- developed; transitions are seamless. Relevant graphics and talking points are included. |
16 pts B Various presentation props and tools are used to enhance persuasion visually and auditorily. It may be overly stimulating at times, but not enough to take away from the persuasive message. The presentation generally engages audience with a consistent flow from screen to screen throughout the entire delivery of the presentation. Communication style and word choice is generally appropriate (e.g., professional). Written work progresses logically and ideas are fairly complete. Bulleted points are developed, but lack cohesion in places. Graphics are mostly relevant and talking points mostly convey necessary information. |
14 pts C Various presentation props and tools may be used, but in a choppy, disconnected way, distracting the audience away from the persuasive message at times. The flow from screen to screen is maintained, but is inconsistent and unnatural throughout the entire delivery of the presentation. Communication style and word choice is generally appropriate (e.g., professional) with occasional use of informal language or terminology inappropriate to audience. Written work usually progresses logically and ideas are fairly complete. Bulleted points are inconsistent or lack cohesion. Graphics are included, but are mostly irrelevant. Talking points convey minimal information. |
10 pts D Minimal variation of props and tools is used and/or the technology is not used to the fullest extent. Video is not timed with the presentation making the content difficult to follow. Attempts appropriate (e.g., professional) communication style and word choice; however, there is frequent use of informal language or terminology inappropriate to audience. Written work often does not progress logically and ideas are often not fully formed. Bulleted points are not well-developed and the reader finds it difficult to follow the presentation flow. Graphics are irrelevant. Talking points not present. |
0 pts 0 There is no variation of presentation props and tools used. The presentation is static, with little to no changes visually or auditorily. Uses informal or inappropriate language or terminology. Written work lacks logical flow and ideas are not fully formed. Bulleted points not developed and reader cannot follow the presentation. Graphics and talking points are not present Does not address this criterion in the assignment. Did not submit assignment. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy. |