CP SOP Week Four Assignmnent

Week Four Assignment
Soundtrack of Your Life
Explanation:
Music has become an integral part of human existence. It motivates us, calms us, inspires us, at times irritates us, and basically becomes the backdrop against which we live our lives. Songs can bring vivid memories of persons, places, and events from our own past and serve to document our thoughts, feelings, and emotions at a given time or place.
Assignment

• Part I: Choosing significant events and finding appropriate songs to represent them.

Brainstorm the types of significant events that you may have experienced in your lives so far. Pick 5 events (choose a variety) and put your events in chronological order (that’s the order in which they happened), and then pick a song that you think accurately represents each event.  In choosing each song, think about the lyrics, the style and the tone or mood of the song. Remember that the music on soundtracks vary in style; your soundtrack should doso, also. Take your time and really explore possible songs in different genres of music. When you’re done,record the song title and artist below. Remember that songs MUST be school appropriate.  I understand thatthis rule limits your choice of songs, but there’s just no getting around it in this setting.

1. What is the name of the song and the artist?
2. What event in your life does the song represent?
3. Why does the song accurately reflect this event?
4. Why do the lyrics capture the essence of this event for you?
5. Why does the style or tone or mood capture the essence of this event for you?
6. What does each song reveal about the kind of person you are and what you think is important in your life?

• Part II: Writing a reflective letter to your listener

Write a reflective letter (addressed to “Dear Listener,”) that explains why you chose the particular songs that youdid. For each song, you will need to reflect on the experiences, persons, places, etc. that inspired this selection.Obviously, you will also need to explain who you are as a person and then offer some type of reflection upon theimaginary album as a whole. Again, for the purposes of this assignment, be sure that this letter is school appropriate.
Assignment Outline
Topic #1—Explanation of yourself (one paragraph):
This paragraph is basically a brief autobiography, and it will serve as your introduction. Introductions aresuper important in writing because they give the reader a frame of reference.

• Who are you?
• Where are you from?
• Where are you now? e
• Overall, what do you think this album says about you?

Topic #2—Explanation of each song on the soundtrack:
This section is made up of many smaller paragraphs. Song by song, be sure to explain:

• What is the name of the song and the artist?
• What event in your life does the song represent?
• Why does the song accurately reflect this event?
• Why do the lyrics capture the essence of this event for you?
• Why does the style or tone or mood capture the essence of this event for you?
• What does each song reveal about the kind of person you are and what you think is important in your life?

Topic #3—Final remarks and reflection on the soundtrack as a whole (one paragraph)
This paragraph is your conclusion in which you should thank your reader for taking the time to listen to your soundtrack and offer any final reflections upon this project as a whole.

• In the introduction, you talked about what this album says about you. Revisit this idea.
• What did you learn while you put together this album?
• What do you think it tells people about you? Is this accurate?
• What do you want people who listen to your soundtrack to think about you when they’re done?

Upload your assignment as a MICROSOFT WORD OR PDF FILE.
Standard academic format— double-spaced, approximately one-inch margins, 12-point Times font (or equivalent font), with cover page.
Source(s) Required: One source required per page
Audience: You are writing to an audience of fellow students with comparable knowledge regarding the topic.
Upload your assignment as a MICROSOFT WORD OR PDF FILE.
Standard academic format— double-spaced, approximately one-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font (or equivalent font), with cover page.
Source(s) Required: At least one source per page required
Audience: You are writing to an audience of fellow students with comparable knowledge regarding the topic.
Length: 2-4 pages excluding Works -Cited page, using MLA format
Rubric
Voorhees College Written Communication Rubric

Voorhees College Written Communication Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext of and Purpose for Writing	4 pts Excellent Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses all elements of the work 3 pts Good Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with audience, purpose, and context 2 pts Acceptable Demonstrates awareness of context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., begins to show awareness of audience’s perceptions and assumptions) 1 pts Unacceptable Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience)	4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeControl of Syntax and Mechanics	4 pts Excellent Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free 3 pts Good Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the portfolio has few errors. 2 pts Acceptable Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some error 1 pts Unacceptable Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage	4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication Criteria #2 Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer’s understanding, and shaping the whole work. threshold: 3.0 pts	4 pts Excellent-Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer’s understanding, and shaping the whole work. 3 pts Good-Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work. 2 pts Acceptable- Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work. 1 pts Unacceptable-Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work.	4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication Criteria #3 Genre or Disciplinary Conventions Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices threshold: 3.0 pts	4 pts Excellent- Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task (s) including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices 3 pts Good-Demonstrates consistent use of important conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s), including organization, content, presentation, and stylistic choices 2 pts Acceptable-Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) for basic organization, content, and presentation 1 pts Unacceptable-Attempts to use a consistent system for basic organization and presentation	4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Communication Criteria #4 Sources of Evidence Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing threshold: 3.0 pts	4 pts Excellent- Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing . 3 pts Good- Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing. 2 pts Acceptable- Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. 1 pts Unacceptable-Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing.	4 pts
Total Points: 20