8300-5ASSIGN_Assessing Alternatives

TOPIC: Assessing Alternatives
Overview
The next phase of the development of a community health promotion project is to research, design, and present a prioritized list of viable intervention alternatives to a group of key decision makers so they have the necessary information to approve a plan to take the project to the next step. The designated project leader should hold an initial meeting to foster effective communication and lay out ground rules to avoid silo thinking. The goals to be accomplished in this meeting should include the following:

1. Educate the team in a systems-thinking approach, including definitions and identification of system elements.
2. Create guidelines for collaborative norms to establish trust among team members.
3. Identify the criteria needed to reach agreement.
4. Based on the final recommendation, create an agenda for the term of the project.

Your task in this assignment is to identify viable alternatives, provide criteria for the selection process, prioritize feasible solution interventions, and offer a “best of breed” recommendation that clearly meets the goals and outcomes of the project stakeholders.
Note: It may be helpful to assume that your audience is a planning group. You will need to incorporate what you learned about typical values and expectations of planning-group members into your development of selection and prioritization criteria.
Instructions
Part One
Create a–7 page Assessing Alternatives—Leader Guidelines document that could be used by you to lead a working meeting that accomplishes the following:

• Demonstrates strategies to integrate the knowledge and skills of the stakeholders participating in the meeting.
• Presents viable alternatives (supported by relevant sources) for consideration by the group.
• Provides criteria (based on best practices from the literature) for the selection process.
• Describes the consensus-building structure for arriving at feasible solution interventions.

In the closing section of your document, imagine that your group has arrived at a recommendation that clearly meets the goals and outcomes of the stakeholders in the project (the organizations and community members).

• Provide a summary of the analysis and results based on the alternatives you presented.
• Describe the implications and recommendations for next steps.

You will need to demonstrate how you would apply best practices in formulation, organization, and operation of a community health planning group and process.
Additional Requirements

• Length: 7 pages (plus cover and references pages).
• Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt., double spaced.
• References: If you cite any material  or other sources, you must include a properly cited reference list using current APA style and format.

 
 
Include SIX academic references above 2017
NO CONSIDERATION FOR PLAGIARISM
APA FORMAT AND INDEX CITATION
PLEASE WRITE FROM PUBLIC HEALTH PERSPECTIVE
Due 5/4/22 at 10am
MAKE SURE TO READ ALL INSTRUCTION VERY CAREFULLY
 
 
 
Part Two
Create a brief (6 slides) PowerPoint slide deck to present your meeting agenda and guide the flow of your meeting. Remember: it is a visual aid, not an educational presentation.  PICTURES, INTRODUCTION, CONCLUSION AND REFERENCE PAGE
Suggested Outline:

• Purpose and Goal of the Meeting.
• Attendees.
• Presentation of Alternative Solution Interventions.
• Criteria for Development of Priority List.
• Recommendations.

 
Include FOUR academic references above 2017
NO CONSIDERATION FOR PLAGIARISM
APA FORMAT AND INDEX CITATION
PLEASE WRITE FROM PUBLIC HEALTH PERSPECTIVE
Due 5/4/24/22 at 10am
MAKE SURE TO READ ALL INSTRUCTION VERY CAREFULLY
 
 
MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW ALL Assessing Alternatives Scoring Guide: TO AGAIN ALL FULL POINTS.

Criteria	Non-performance	Basic	Proficient	Distinguished
Create guidelines for leading an interprofessional collaborative planning group. 20%	Does not create guidelines for leading an interprofessional collaborative planning group.	Creates guidelines for leading an interprofessional collaborative planning group, but the guidelines are unclear or incomplete.	Creates guidelines for leading an interprofessional collaborative planning group.	Creates guidelines for leading an interprofessional collaborative planning group and identifies assumptions on which the guidelines were based.
Present viable alternatives to promote community health for consideration, supported by relevant sources. 16%	Does not present viable alternatives to promote community health for consideration, supported by relevant sources.	Presents alternatives to promote community health for consideration, but the alternatives are unclear or the sources are inappropriate.	Presents viable alternatives to promote community health for consideration, supported by relevant sources.	Presents viable alternatives to promote community health for consideration, supported by relevant sources, and identifies assumptions on which the selection of alternatives was based.
Provide criteria for a selection process based on best practices from the literature. 16%	Does not provide criteria for a selection process based on best practices from the literature.	Provides criteria for a selection process based on best practices from the literature, but the criteria are unclear or incomplete.	Provides criteria for a selection process based on best practices from the literature.	Provides criteria for a selection process based on best practices from the literature, and identifies assumptions on which the selection of alternatives was based.
Select a negotiation and consensus-building method to facilitate the final choice of an implementation strategy. 16%	Does not select a negotiation and consensus-building method to facilitate the final choice of an implementation strategy.	Describes negotiation and consensus-building methods to facilitate the final choice of an implementation strategy, but does not select a specific method to use.	Selects a negotiation and consensus-building method to facilitate the final choice of an implementation strategy.	Selects a negotiation and consensus-building method to facilitate the final choice of an implementation strategy and identifies criteria that could be used to evaluate the meeting outcome and processes.
Make a recommendation based on the analysis of alternative interventions. 16%	Does not make a recommendation based on the analysis of alternative interventions.	Makes a recommendation based on the analysis of alternative interventions, but the recommendation is unclear or incomplete.	Makes a recommendation based on the analysis of alternative interventions.	Makes a recommendation based on the analysis of alternative interventions, integrating the best and most appropriate elements from multiple approaches.
Create a PowerPoint presentation that can be used to run a working session of an interprofessional team meeting. 16%	Does not create a PowerPoint presentation that can be used to run a working session of an interprofessional team meeting.	Creates a PowerPoint presentation that can be used to run a working session of an interprofessional team meeting, but the design or content detracts from the overall message of the presentation.	Creates a PowerPoint presentation that can be used to run a working session of an interprofessional team meeting.	Creates a PowerPoint presentation that can be used to run a working session of an interprofessional team meeting and demonstrates a superior understanding of the technology through the use of a clean, clear, and concise message and design format.